Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 3, 2016 at 5:17 am #26741
Hi George, same thing as the other issue I had I guess. Server being too slow for this task.
June 3, 2016 at 5:16 am #26740It’s true that my server has problems with this and I’m looking for another hosting solution. So perhaps I will just forget this. Could be indeed a matter of slow response from the server.
June 3, 2016 at 5:14 am #26739Could something like this not be an option?
June 2, 2016 at 5:37 pm #26722So that still is the most difficult part for me to decide where to host my site. Some are perfect but offer ‘only’ 20 or 30 gb of storage. Any news yet on the plans that Symbiostock will offer?
June 1, 2016 at 9:16 pm #26714Hi Robin,
I just posted a similar topic before I saw this one. It comes down to the question if there is way to store just the hi-rez images somewhere else, and only connect and download that hi-rez image when someone buys that image. So if no one buys an image, no data traffic to that external source.
I agree, Amazon is not an option. It looks tempting at first, but I also read the things you mention and that can get very very costly.
May 21, 2016 at 6:16 pm #26670PHP 7 is said to be much faster than 5.x. Needless to say my site is also running on version 7 and thumbnails are missing too 😉
May 19, 2016 at 7:00 pm #26662That still gives me a false url.
I could only use https://www.jacktummers.nl/?c=1&ss_c=8ea259dfbb66af237ebc
but is that enough?May 6, 2016 at 3:19 am #26568Thanks Steve. I read your post and that was very helpfull. 🙂
May 5, 2016 at 6:31 pm #26564Just a quick question… What if all the logos and trademark images were still on the truck, that would be ok for just an editorial licence, yes?
October 10, 2015 at 4:43 am #24300Ok. And how many pixels are your images? 12, 16, 32 megapixels?
These are the different results with a 12MP image from the Nikon D700 in Aftershot Pro. What a difference in size, but not visually.
October 10, 2015 at 3:21 am #24296Wonderfull response :). And true. So, what is the compression level of your images? 100%? Or do you upload them as tiff? That would be the best option then. A photograph of 85Mb for just 10 dollars! Wow!
October 9, 2015 at 12:00 am #24277My hosting provider says there might be something missing in the url I used because the format is wrong (?).
I used only this part: https://www.jacktummers.nl/?c=1&ss_c=8ea259dfbb66af237ebc
of the total string: curl -silent -A ‘Mozilla’ ‘https://www.jacktummers.nl/?c=1&ss_c=8ea259dfbb66af237ebc’ >/dev/null 2>&1
October 8, 2015 at 10:37 pm #24275That website only allows for 50 runs a day.
But I think it is working now. I’m getting a mail every minute with this content. Does this mean it is working ok now?
My host runs FreeBSD by the way.,October 8, 2015 at 7:00 pm #24272@steve, thanks for dropping in on this question and explaining what you did. Sounds good and your site has a really good response time. Is this a managed VPS you have? I’m a Linux user myself, nevertheless I don’t really want to get into maintaining the server myself.
I think for now I will see how it goes, and if it really becomes a problem I will move to a VPS.
@robin Do I have to reference this task to a specific file? I can’t add it to my cronjob list otherwise. My hosting provider (Transip) uses his own system and asks me this. Perhaps I need to attach it to the index.php file?
October 8, 2015 at 1:18 am #24268You are probably right. I will keep on testing here and there to see if I can improve things a little bit more, but for now I’m already very pleased with the result. I didn’t know what you said about the WC cache related products, so good to know. Perhaps I will disable that.
Any idea about the long time it takes to proces images after uploading? Imagick?
And do I always have to go to the settings page to start the process or will it eventually start by itself? -
AuthorPosts